Make vs n8n
SaaS automation vs self-hostable open-source — which workflow tool is better?
Last updated: March 2026
Quick Verdict
Make (Integromat) and n8n are extremely close in our editor's assessment. Make (Integromat) scores 4.4/5 while n8n scores 4.3/5. Your choice should come down to your specific use case and preferences.
| Comparison | Make (Integromat) | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Editor's Score | 4.4/5 ⭐ | 4.3/5 |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting Price | $0/mo | $0/mo |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |
| Key Features |
|
|
Make (Integromat)
Pros
- ✓ More powerful than Zapier for complex flows
- ✓ Great visual builder
- ✓ Good free tier
- ✓ AI features are helpful
Cons
- ✗ Steeper learning curve
- ✗ Complex pricing by operations
- ✗ Can be overwhelming for beginners
n8n
Pros
- ✓ Free and open-source
- ✓ Self-hostable for privacy
- ✓ Custom code flexibility
- ✓ AI nodes are powerful
Cons
- ✗ Requires technical setup
- ✗ Fewer integrations than Make/Zapier
- ✗ UI less polished
Bottom Line: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Make (Integromat) if you value more powerful than zapier for complex flows and great visual builder. It's priced from $0/mo and particularly strong for users who prioritize visual workflow builder.
Choose n8n if you value free and open-source and self-hostable for privacy. At $0/mo, it's a solid choice for those who need visual workflow builder.
Related Comparisons
Can't decide? Let AI help.
AI Tool FinderNever miss the next big AI tool
Get our curated picks of the best new AI tools, tips, and deals delivered to your inbox every Thursday.
No spam, ever. Unsubscribe anytime.